qpid-proton mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Darryl L. Pierce" <dpie...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Fixing the merge commit in the git repo?
Date Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:38:29 GMT
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:15:21PM -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 17:11 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > Additionally, while working on a task branch, to resynch with master do
> > a rebase:
> > 
> >  $ rebase -i master
> > 
> > rather than merging master down onto your task branch. I saw a *lot* of
> > that while examining the merge commits. Rebasing is by far one of the
> > most awesome features of git.
> 
> I agree and disagree  with this simplistic position.
> 
> If (and only if) your task branch is yours and yours alone and no one
> has ever relied on it then you can safely rebase it. Actually I find
> that rebasing is a lot more useful to get my commits in a logical
> sequence of smaller working commits (by using rebase -i).

Sorry, I should have clarified that this is my assumption, that a task
branch is a private branch that you are working on and not one you're
sharing with others.

> On the other hand merging topic branches into master is also perfectly
> sensible to finish off work on a topic branch especially a long lived
> one.
> 
> A long lived topic branch will necessarily have some level of merging
> from master to keep it up to date.
> 
> On the other hand I agree that merging from master just before merging
> to master is irritating and pointless.
> 
> Andrew
> 
> 

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/


Mime
View raw message