quetz-mod_python-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <gri...@apache.org>
Subject Core Vote (Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing)
Date Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:05:35 GMT

Sorry for the late response - I was trying to have a "vacation" - that's 
when you are geographically in a different place with slow internet access 
and read only "some" of your e-mail.... ;-)

+1 for core vote (with the note about the 2.2.2 XP SP2 issue).

Grisha

On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Graham Dumpleton wrote:

>
> On 08/07/2006, at 4:26 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
>> Hi Grisha,
>> 
>> Here is the tally:
>> 
>> +1 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2, Apache 2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.0 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.2
>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.0 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
>> +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
>> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.06, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
>> +1 MacOSX 10.4.6 PPC, Apache-2.0.55 (mpm/worker), Python-2.3.5
>> +1 MacOSX 10.4.6 PPC, Apache-2.2.1 (mpm/worker), Python-2.3.5
>> +1 MacOSX 10.4.7 Intel, Apache-2.0.55 (mpm/prefork), Python-2.4.2
>> +1 Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4.3
>> 
>> -1 Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4.3
>> 
>> The -1 was from Nicolas, with the following comment:
>> "Only two tests fail but with a segfault, it's test_srv_register_cleanup
>> and test_apache_register_cleanup. This is not really surprising... I
>> think we should go ahead and release the 3.2.9 version, while filing a
>> known bug regarding the fact that we drop the support for those two
>> functions. If we accept this, then it's a +1.
>
> The issue with server cleanups failing and why is covered by:
>
>  http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-109
>
>> The last test results were submitted July 1, so I think we may as well
>> have a core vote.
>> 
>> Jim
>> 
>> Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm barely keeping my head above water right now with work, so not
>>> really following the list - if someone could please ping me when/if you
>>> think we're ready for the core group vote and we have a tally.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Grisha
>>> 
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 23:18:05 -0400
>>> From: Jorey Bump <list@joreybump.com>
>>> To: python-dev@httpd.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
>>> 
>>> +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
>>> 
>>> Jim Gallacher wrote:
>>>> The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
>>>> 
>>>> This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested 
>>>> anyway
>>>> - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging 
>>>> and
>>>> packaging.
>>>> 
>>>> Here are the rules:
>>>> 
>>>> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
>>>> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
>>>> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to 
>>>> _this_
>>>>  list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
>>>> personally).
>>>> 
>>>> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>>>> 
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/ 
>>>> mod_python-3.2.9.tgz
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/ 
>>>> mod_python-3.2.9.tgz.md5
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Please download it, then do the usual
>>>> 
>>>> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
>>>> $ make
>>>> $ (su)
>>>> # make install
>>>> 
>>>> Then (as non-root user!)
>>>> 
>>>> $ cd test
>>>> $ python test.py
>>>> 
>>>> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if 
>>>> they
>>>> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, 
>>>> Python,
>>>> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>>>> 
>>>> Please present your test results in the following format:
>>>> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>>>> 
>>>> For example:
>>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>>>> 
>>>> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
>>>> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
>>>> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
>>>> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
>>>> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
>>>> extract this information automatically. :)
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you for your assistance,
>>>> Jim Gallacher
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>

Mime
View raw message