ranger-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Velmurugan Periasamy <vperias...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 66946: Good coding practice for ranger response codes
Date Fri, 04 May 2018 14:00:07 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66946/#review202441
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Velmurugan Periasamy


On May 4, 2018, 10:26 a.m., Nikhil P wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66946/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 4, 2018, 10:26 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Don Bosco Durai, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj,
Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-2091
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-2091
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Good coding practice for ranger response codes
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/security/web/authentication/RangerAuthenticationEntryPoint.java
de3891e 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66946/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1)Tested on simple as well as kerberised environment.
> 2)Tested with Knox SSO,Knox Proxy, wire encryption.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nikhil P
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message