rave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ciancetta, Jesse E." <jc...@mitre.org>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate
Date Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:48:43 GMT
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ciancetta, Jesse E. [mailto:jcian@mitre.org]
>Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 11:27 AM
>To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate
>One thing I noticed when testing is that drag and drop seems to be a little
>quirkier than I recall it being in the past...
>When I try to drag the second or third gadget down in one column to the top
>of a different column I have a hard time getting the drop target to show up
>where I want it.
>I pulled down 0.5 and tested there and I'm not seeing the issue so it seems it
>was introduced somewhere in 0.6.
>Is anyone else seeing this too?
>It wasn't a big enough issue (IMO) for me to vote -1 but it's definitely
>something we'll want to look into.  I'll try to take a look over the changes in
>SVN in a bit to see if I can spot any likely causes but in the meantime if anyone
>recalls any changes they've made which might have introduced the issue
>please let me know.

So I've narrowed it down a bit...

I diffed exported versions of 0.5 and 0.6 and noticed a lot of changes in default.css -- so
I took the 0.5 css and dropped it into a 0.6 deployment and it resolved the issue.  So the
issue is definitely somewhere in the 60-or-so css changes that were made in 0.6.

CSS/browser hacking is definitely not one of my stronger skills so I'm planning to stop digging
into this for now in case someone else with stronger css skills wouldn't mind having a look.

If someone else hasn't already resolved it by next week I can try to take another look.

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfranklin@mitre.org]
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 6:31 PM
>>To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.6-incubating Release Candidate
>>Discussion thread for vote on 0.6-incubating release candidate.
>>Note, there were two staging repos created during the release process.  I am
>>unsure why this happened, but I did have a network hiccup while the release
>>script was running, so maybe that was the issue. All of the artifacts appear to
>>have made it fine, but it would be good to have a  second pair of eyes check
>>Also, I forgot to create a combined release with the updated master pom
>>containing the metadata that has Sean as a committer/PPMC member listed.
>>For more information on the release process, checkout -
>>Some of the things to check before voting are:
>>- can you run the demo binaries
>>- can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
>>- do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE and
>>- are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
>>- is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server

View raw message