rave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jasha Joachimsthal <j.joachimst...@onehippo.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.10 Release Candidate
Date Mon, 09 Apr 2012 10:46:36 GMT
Tested the portal and it works again. Thanks for fixing it.


On 6 April 2012 20:37, Mahadevan, Venkat <venkatm@mitre.org> wrote:

> Fixed the issue. Please let me know otherwise.
>
>
> Venkat
>
>
> On 4/6/12 9:19 AM, "Mahadevan, Venkat" <venkatm@mitre.org> wrote:
>
> >Jasha, I will work on RAVE-541 and fix the issue
> >
> >
> >
> >On 4/6/12 6:26 AM, "Jasha Joachimsthal" <j.joachimsthal@onehippo.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>On 6 April 2012 10:46, Ate Douma <ate@douma.nu> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 04/06/2012 10:41 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I've got two remarks so far:
> >>>>
> >>>> a) This release candidate is dependent on the non-yet released
> >>>> rave-master-0.10,
> >>>> which I don't like much.
> >>>>
> >>>> IMO it would have been better to wait another day until the
> >>>>rave-master
> >>>> was
> >>>> formally released. Although the rave-master release most certainly
> >>>>will
> >>>> commence, in theory if we find a last minute blocker issue with it
> >>>> causing its
> >>>> release to be failed, it would cause *this* release candidate then to
> >>>>fail
> >>>> automatically as well...
> >>>>
> >>>> b) Issue RAVE-553 just reported by Jasha and also confirmed by myself
> >>>> makes the
> >>>> release useless for all practical use-cases and most certainly should
> >>>> have been
> >>>> easily tested/found before the release. We should look into improving
> >>>>our
> >>>> quality assurance and add some minimal but sensible (interaction)
> >>>>testing
> >>>> plan
> >>>> which should pass before we cut a release candidate because this is
> >>>>quite
> >>>> annoying.
> >>>>
> >>>> For b) I'm inclined to vote -1 or at least -0. As I haven't had time
> >>>>to
> >>>> further
> >>>> review I'll postpone casting my vote for now but it doesn't look rosy
> >>>>to
> >>>> me.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> BTW: just want to make clear, especially for Raminder, I consider b)
> >>>and
> >>> the need for improving on our quality assurance a responsibility of the
> >>> team, including myself, not one of the release-manager who but must
> >>>execute
> >>> and ascertain this.
> >>
> >>
> >>If I revert the commit in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-541
> >>I
> >>can create new users again. I don't know what the intention of this
> >>feature
> >>was, but the result is that it creates a new PROFILE page instead of a
> >>new
> >>USER page. The portal cannot handle a user without a user page. The
> >>portal
> >>can however render a profile page if no profile page is present yet for
> >>that user.
> >>
> >>We have multiple options:
> >>0. accept the 0.10 release, but I also doubt between -0 and -1
> >>1. reject the 0.10 release, fix or revert the issue, no new release until
> >>the end of the month
> >>2. reject the 0.10 release, revert the commit done for RAVE-541 and
> >>create
> >>a new 0.10.1 release after the rave-master pom has been released
> >>3. reject the 0.10 release, fix the RAVE-541 issue and create a new
> >>0.10.1
> >>release after the rave-master pom has been released
> >>
> >>For option 2 & 3 we don't want other new features in the 0.10.1 release
> >>so
> >>either
> >>a. hold all commits until the issue RAVE-541 has been resolved or
> >>reverted.
> >>Create a release from trunk (0.11-SNAPSHOT -> 0.10.1 -> 0.11-SNAPSHOT)
> >>b. create a branch from 0.10 tag (0.10.1-SNAPSHOT), fix or revert
> >>RAVE-541,
> >>release from the branch (0.10.1-SNAPSHOT -> 0.10.1 -> 0.10.2-SNAPSHOT).
> >>Merge the fix into trunk (0.11-SNAPSHOT)
> >>
> >>@Venkat (or whoever can fix the issue and knows what the intention was):
> >>in
> >>case we want a 0.10.1 release, do you think you can fix this issue soon,
> >>shall we first revert your commit and give you more time to solve it?
> >>
> >>Jasha
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Ate
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 04/06/2012 02:51 AM, Raminderjeet Singh wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> This is discussion thread for vote on Apache Rave Project 0.10
> >>>>>Release
> >>>>> Candidate
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For more information on the release process, checkout -
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>http://rave.apache.org/**release-management.html<
> http://rave.apache.or
> >>>>>g
> >>>>>/release-management.html>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
> >>>>> - can you run the demo binaries
> >>>>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
> >>>>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE
> >>>>>and
> >>>>> DISCLAIMER files
> >>>>> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
> >>>>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public
> >>>>>server
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message