From dev-return-7222-apmail-rave-dev-archive=rave.apache.org@rave.apache.org Wed Dec 5 00:35:51 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-rave-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-rave-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49A72D244 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 00:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80932 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2012 00:35:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-rave-dev-archive@rave.apache.org Received: (qmail 80901 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2012 00:35:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@rave.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@rave.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@rave.apache.org Received: (qmail 80891 invoked by uid 99); 5 Dec 2012 00:35:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:35:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.51] (HELO mail-wg0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:35:43 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id gg4so2340570wgb.6 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:35:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=SjjRuw8usyBvUYFdfFFksS3nSlzbpC0VraFUvKQbRp4=; b=pbLdu314DJJmJzGNpd7TqFrpDHzvX98W3qPTnM2u1yT0bInUaAIUGdmsrT6forw98P UGWfsWbk6g8xL1mbv97YSTdzxVUyP7W0a3SKdFwaeTxPB1whyk+64Gwd7Mtle/X+JxOW O1/b97oGWR3daMhvXh/EM9NDevjcrKYqRr9QMz6ZUdfLKFyt7FuYms+tcEFhd3VuK1K0 1/uKKaXfFC9ZEhaNsR8/2/LBnYfeQTtE0RQpfVxc/vcSPugHykOAwvwss663NRen/QAX zsy0Dt2JV3uTmTFPLS9KbDRACA6oKMTWQLpaBd1vlsKMrn2NgP65Ao6V98jGA1FTr+4r yZpQ== Received: by 10.216.141.86 with SMTP id f64mr5517717wej.38.1354667720197; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:35:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (092-130-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl. [62.45.130.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bz12sm4169680wib.5.2012.12.04.16.35.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:35:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50BE96C6.9010209@douma.nu> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:35:18 +0100 From: Ate Douma User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@rave.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.18 Release Candidate References: <18874_1354422851_qB24YAkv003187_CEFA4ECA-5382-4C11-B855-DA8259FD3CB6@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <18874_1354422851_qB24YAkv003187_CEFA4ECA-5382-4C11-B855-DA8259FD3CB6@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn99hPI6p8kLiWQ7WmTr10Ptakkt9n+O5XZH4+bsknw8NmnnwYwJN+u2BnOyWau3OyYiNaG X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I tested the 0.18 release and all-in-all it works pretty fine. The performance on H2 still is an issue of course but not blocking (RAVE-838). Also, RAVE-845 seems to be fixed, deleting a user with friend associations now works. However I discovered a new, and IMO worse error RAVE-859: when I delete a user who has pages shared with, that action also deletes those shared pages which aren't 'owned' by this user. Rather destructive... I'm not sure we should qualify this as a release blocker, as we already canceled the previous release candidate, but *functionally* it certainly qualifies. I don't know if anyone (yet) is using this feature in an (almost) production environment, but if so then they should *not* upgrade to this 0.18 release candidate until this bug is fixed. Or, well, maybe previous releases also had this bug already (I haven't had time to check) in which case it doesn't really matter. WDYT: should we accept this as a known/recognized bug (and then highlight this in the release announcement) or qualify this as a release blocker? I'm holding off voting +1/-1 for now. Ate On 12/02/2012 05:34 AM, Raminderjeet Singh wrote: > Discussion thread for vote on 0.18 release candidate. > > For more information on the release process, checkout - > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > > Some of the things to check before voting are: > - can you run the demo binaries > - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag > - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE and NOTICE files > - are all of the staged artifacts signed and the signature verifiable > - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server >