rave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Woonsan Ko <woon_...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Rave 0.19 Release Candidate
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:34:36 GMT
Well, I wasn't aware of the MongoDB profile, so I didn't test it. I built with the default
profile and it worked without any problem.




>________________________________
> From: Matt Franklin <m.ben.franklin@gmail.com>
>To: "dev@rave.apache.org" <dev@rave.apache.org>; Woonsan Ko <woonsan@apache.org>

>Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 10:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Rave 0.19 Release Candidate
> 
>On Wednesday, January 9, 2013, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
>> I've verified those things and everything seems okay.
>> But, I have one minor thing: I'm afraid the fix version for RAVE-818
>> should not be 0.19.
>> If we publish the release notes url like we did for 0.18, then including
>> RAVE-818 can be misleading.
>
>
>Are you getting the same error as Chris?
>
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Woonsan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >________________________________
>> > From: Matt Franklin <m.ben.franklin@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> >To: dev@rave.apache.org <javascript:;>
>> >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 6:35 PM
>> >Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.19 Release Candidate
>> >
>> >Discussion thread for vote on 0.19 release candidate.
>> >
>> >For more information on the release process, checkout -
>> >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>> >
>> >Some of the things to check before voting are:
>> >- can you run the demo binaries
>> >- can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
>> >- do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE and NOTICE
>> files
>> >- are all of the staged artifacts signed and the signature verifiable
>> >- is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message