rave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.19 Release Candidate
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:41:21 GMT
I've already changed the NOTICE files last night because I also noticed it
(pun intended). ;)

On 10 January 2013 15:33, Marlon Pierce <marpierc@iu.edu> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> One nitpick: the copyright date in the notice should be 2013.
>
>
> Marlon
>
>
> On 1/7/13 6:35 PM, Matt Franklin wrote:
> > Discussion thread for vote on 0.19 release candidate.
> >
> > For more information on the release process, checkout -
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> >
> > Some of the things to check before voting are: - can you run the
> > demo binaries - can you build the contents of source-release.zip
> > and svn tag - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required
> > LICENSE and NOTICE files - are all of the staged artifacts signed
> > and the signature verifiable - is the signing key in the project's
> > KEYS file and on a public server
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ7tFVAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5/30IAM9U3ThzPAnuAafat7Mz+dRF
> FyXCmZLzJLPg9J6jx29oo2OAE804MvLH2A7ggn6bHP/igRkMcOkARed6tIQibVG8
> iq5vE5x/Y94NtQh6yxdrWPDpWtUJJbMv7u5VuFfPrTXC7p5Xhc86MUm2+sA/nxFD
> Imt9wrrC+k17v8GqnoqapFuyovWvdmcFvgJ9ENu3CXum3u/R0NRw34NDdjKAEA06
> IFO8Ce3n+4xyC/+m1ZNIgdbfHj/galqtAFwjNDv4XsVXvimiSTMPNTntS34mIMtk
> HUTnSphaQuLEDS64gRLft7pYyNXpjtZh0v/oASJ+qBTma6PYRhGBwDT5uOTsdC0=
> =B2iY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message