rave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erin Noe-Payne <erin.noe.pa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.21 Release Candidate
Date Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:07:09 GMT
Sounds good. I have fixes for the js issues prepared. Will we just
make commits to trunk as usual? Should I do that now or do we need to
wait?

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Chris Geer <chris@cxtsoftware.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <jasha@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 4 April 2013 18:04, Matt Franklin <m.ben.franklin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Erin Noe-Payne <
>> erin.noe.payne@gmail.com
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > In other words, I would propose fixing the logged issues and
>> > > re-spinning the 0.21 release. Thoughts?
>> > >
>> >
>> > Given that our last release was a security fix, I think it would be good
>> to
>> > get things working properly and get 0.21 out the door.  IMO, the console
>> > log thing is a problem and same with the Archetype issue Jasha filed.
>>  Same
>> > goes for the mongodb issue Chris found.
>> >
>> > +1 for cancel, concentrated fix and respin in this instance.
>> >
>>
>> In that case, please keep the 0.21 tag, drop its artifacts from the repo
>> and create a new 0.21.1 release after the issues have been fixed.
>>
>> Jasha, I agree.
>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Erin Noe-Payne
>> > > <erin.noe.payne@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > Reading the release process docs it looks like there are some
>> > > > repercussions for casting a -1 vote on a release, so I wanted to hold
>> > > > off before voting.  However it looks to me like there are enough
>> major
>> > > > issues that we should resolve these before making the 0.21 release?
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <
>> jasha@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> Found a minor issue. When you create a project from the archetype,
>> the
>> > > JDBC
>> > > >> setup is incorrect. It will build, but not run [1]
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Jasha
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-949
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 3 April 2013 20:27, Raminder Singh <ramifnu@iu.edu> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> Discussion thread for vote on 0.21 release candidate.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> For more information on the release process, checkout -
>> > > >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
>> > > >>> - can you run the demo binaries
>> > > >>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn
tag
>> > > >>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE
and
>> > > NOTICE
>> > > >>> files
>> > > >>> - are all of the staged artifacts signed and the signature
>> verifiable
>> > > >>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public
>> > server
>> > >
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message