rave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.21 Release Candidate
Date Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:02:46 GMT
The big thing is the MongoDB thing for me. Can anyone else test that? If
that truly doesn't work then it's a showstopper.


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Erin Noe-Payne <erin.noe.payne@gmail.com>wrote:

> In other words, I would propose fixing the logged issues and
> re-spinning the 0.21 release. Thoughts?
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Erin Noe-Payne
> <erin.noe.payne@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Reading the release process docs it looks like there are some
> > repercussions for casting a -1 vote on a release, so I wanted to hold
> > off before voting.  However it looks to me like there are enough major
> > issues that we should resolve these before making the 0.21 release?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <jasha@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Found a minor issue. When you create a project from the archetype, the
> JDBC
> >> setup is incorrect. It will build, but not run [1]
> >>
> >> Jasha
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-949
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3 April 2013 20:27, Raminder Singh <ramifnu@iu.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Discussion thread for vote on 0.21 release candidate.
> >>>
> >>> For more information on the release process, checkout -
> >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> >>>
> >>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
> >>> - can you run the demo binaries
> >>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
> >>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE and
> NOTICE
> >>> files
> >>> - are all of the staged artifacts signed and the signature verifiable
> >>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message