royale-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)
Date Tue, 03 Oct 2017 06:36:16 GMT
I prefer royale-docs

Thanks,
Om

On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:

> Per Infra:  "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to point to.
> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or whatever
> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in 'master' branch
> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on
> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)"
>
> Shall we create a royale-pages repo?  Anybody think it should have some
> other name?  "royale-documentation"?  I think it will hold our non-ASDoc
> user documentation.
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> >I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per Apache
> >Project.
> >
> >It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product.  Combining repos
> >for a release is a bit of extra work.  There should be examples in the
> >IDE-friendly artifact.  IMO, TourJS would have its own release schedule.
> >
> >My 2 cents,
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website (i.e. Github
> >>Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to tourjs in a
> >>way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial on how to
> >>use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the components. They
> >>seem separate and complimentary.
> >>
> >>Harbs
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent <pent@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from royale-asjs and
> >>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for that would
> >>>work
> >>> well.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples.
> >>>
> >>> ‹peter
> >>>
> >>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option and they
> >>>>want
> >>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1]
> >>>>
> >>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers.
> >>>>
> >>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and royale-website? Does
> >>>>anyone
> >>>> see a reason for a wiki in those?
> >>>>
> >>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² repo?
A
> >>>>wiki
> >>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Harbs
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fiss
> >>>>u
> >>>>es
> >>>>
> >>>>.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138%
> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401
> >>>>%
> >>>>26
> >>>>
> >>>>page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%
> 3Acomment-tabpan
> >>>>e
> >>>>l%
> >>>>
> >>>>23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1
> 76d8%7
> >>>>C
> >>>>fa
> >>>>
> >>>>7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688&
> sdata=%2FSB
> >>>>h
> >>>>%2
> >>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message