samza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] SQL workflow
Date Wed, 04 Feb 2015 19:13:07 GMT
Just did the update w/ SAMZA-482.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
wrote:

> I think so. There was some RB downtime, but it just got fixed. Yi, Navina,
> Milinda, can you make sure your JIRAs have up to date RBs?
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:24 AM, sriram <sriram.sub@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Can we have updated RBs for all the three sub tasks before we commit?
> This
> > would help us to review even after we commit.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > Yi, Navina, and Milinda have been working on SAMZA-390 sub-tickets
> > related
> > > to SQL operators. We're getting to the point where the amount of work
> > > floating around is quite large, and some tickets build off of others.
> > >
> > > I'm proposing that we commit this work into a samza-sql submodule on
> > > master, and treat this module as experimental. I want to avoid
> branches,
> > > and I also want to avoid revision control over JIRA. This means that
> > there
> > > will probably be a fair amount of commits/JIRAs on this module as we
> > > iterate, but I think that's OK.
> > >
> > > Does this sound good to everyone?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Chris
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message