Andrey Paykin |
code cleanups |
Mon, 04 Feb, 12:54 |
Yi Pan |
Re: code cleanups |
Mon, 04 Feb, 19:04 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru opened a new pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Thu, 07 Feb, 20:30 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru merged pull request #909: Support for empty records |
Thu, 07 Feb, 20:30 |
|
[GitHub] srinipunuru commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
|
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Thu, 07 Feb, 22:21 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Thu, 07 Feb, 22:22 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Mon, 11 Feb, 17:31 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Mon, 11 Feb, 17:34 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] shenodaguirguis commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Fri, 08 Feb, 00:02 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu opened a new pull request #912: Test sideinputrefactor |
Fri, 08 Feb, 03:42 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] strkkk opened a new pull request #913: SAMZA-2102: [samza-azure] code cleanup and refactoring |
Fri, 08 Feb, 09:51 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] strkkk opened a new pull request #914: SAMZA-2103: [samza-aws] code cleanup and refactoring |
Fri, 08 Feb, 13:17 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu commented on issue #876: SEP-19 : Basic Standby task/container implementation |
Fri, 08 Feb, 19:17 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu closed pull request #876: SEP-19 : Basic Standby task/container implementation |
Fri, 08 Feb, 19:17 |
|
[GitHub] atoomula commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
|
GitBox |
[GitHub] atoomula commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Sat, 09 Feb, 14:52 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] atoomula commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Sat, 09 Feb, 14:52 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] atoomula commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Sat, 09 Feb, 14:52 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] atoomula commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Sat, 09 Feb, 14:52 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] atoomula commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Sat, 09 Feb, 14:52 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] atoomula commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Mon, 11 Feb, 19:06 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] atoomula commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Mon, 11 Feb, 19:06 |
|
[GitHub] weiqingy commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
|
GitBox |
[GitHub] weiqingy commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Mon, 11 Feb, 19:00 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] weiqingy commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Mon, 11 Feb, 19:02 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] weiqingy commented on a change in pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Mon, 11 Feb, 19:03 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru merged pull request #911: Support for types in Samza SQL UDF |
Mon, 11 Feb, 22:08 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu opened a new pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 02:05 |
|
[GitHub] mynameborat commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
|
GitBox |
[GitHub] mynameborat commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 07:06 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] mynameborat commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 07:06 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] mynameborat commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 07:06 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] mynameborat commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 07:06 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] mynameborat commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 07:06 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] mynameborat commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 17:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] mynameborat commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 17:42 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] mynameborat commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 21:47 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] mynameborat commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 21:47 |
|
[GitHub] rmatharu commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
|
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 07:48 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 07:49 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 07:49 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 07:49 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 07:49 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:52 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Wed, 13 Feb, 01:13 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu commented on a change in pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Wed, 13 Feb, 01:13 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] shanthoosh merged pull request #874: SAMZA-2058: Integrate the input stream expansion aware SystemStreamGrouper to JobModel generation flow. |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:27 |
|
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
|
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:41 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 18:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 18:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 18:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 18:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 18:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 18:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 19:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 19:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 19:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 19:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 19:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 19:58 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 19:58 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 19:58 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #903: SEP-19: Allocator changes for standby-aware container allocation, and active container failover |
Wed, 27 Feb, 20:10 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu commented on issue #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Tue, 12 Feb, 18:54 |
Yang Zhang |
apache git link is no longer valid |
Tue, 12 Feb, 21:40 |
Jake Maes |
Re: apache git link is no longer valid |
Wed, 13 Feb, 17:09 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru opened a new pull request #916: End to end test case for union type with subRecord |
Tue, 12 Feb, 22:44 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] jmakes merged pull request #914: SAMZA-2103: [samza-aws] code cleanup and refactoring |
Wed, 13 Feb, 15:14 |
|
[GitHub] atoomula commented on a change in pull request #916: End to end test case for union type with subRecord |
|
GitBox |
[GitHub] atoomula commented on a change in pull request #916: End to end test case for union type with subRecord |
Wed, 13 Feb, 15:38 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] atoomula commented on a change in pull request #916: End to end test case for union type with subRecord |
Wed, 13 Feb, 15:38 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] jmakes merged pull request #913: SAMZA-2102: [samza-azure] code cleanup and refactoring |
Wed, 13 Feb, 15:39 |
|
[GitHub] srinipunuru commented on a change in pull request #916: End to end test case for union type with subRecord |
|
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru commented on a change in pull request #916: End to end test case for union type with subRecord |
Wed, 13 Feb, 19:17 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru commented on a change in pull request #916: End to end test case for union type with subRecord |
Wed, 13 Feb, 19:17 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru commented on issue #916: End to end test case for union type with subRecord |
Wed, 13 Feb, 19:18 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] srinipunuru merged pull request #916: End to end test case for union type with subRecord |
Wed, 13 Feb, 19:18 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] asfgit closed pull request #915: Consolidating offset read and write for store-offsets and side-inputs, maintaining backward compatbility |
Wed, 13 Feb, 21:36 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] rmatharu opened a new pull request #917: Adding bounded-time start of SamzaContainer from StreamProcessor |
Thu, 14 Feb, 00:02 |
|
[GitHub] Sanil15 commented on a change in pull request #917: Adding bounded-time start of SamzaContainer from StreamProcessor |
|
GitBox |
[GitHub] Sanil15 commented on a change in pull request #917: Adding bounded-time start of SamzaContainer from StreamProcessor |
Thu, 14 Feb, 01:53 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] Sanil15 commented on a change in pull request #917: Adding bounded-time start of SamzaContainer from StreamProcessor |
Thu, 14 Feb, 02:09 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] Sanil15 commented on a change in pull request #917: Adding bounded-time start of SamzaContainer from StreamProcessor |
Thu, 14 Feb, 02:32 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] Sanil15 commented on a change in pull request #917: Adding bounded-time start of SamzaContainer from StreamProcessor |
Thu, 14 Feb, 02:34 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] Sanil15 commented on a change in pull request #917: Adding bounded-time start of SamzaContainer from StreamProcessor |
Thu, 14 Feb, 02:36 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] shanthoosh closed pull request #901: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Thu, 14 Feb, 01:59 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] shanthoosh opened a new pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Thu, 14 Feb, 02:36 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] shanthoosh commented on issue #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Thu, 14 Feb, 02:37 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] strkkk opened a new pull request #919: Make config immutable again |
Thu, 14 Feb, 08:16 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] jmakes merged pull request #919: Make config immutable again |
Thu, 14 Feb, 14:47 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] vjagadish1989 commented on a change in pull request #899: SAMZA-2091: Update ZkClient in samza-standalone to use string serializer |
Thu, 14 Feb, 19:17 |
|
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
|
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Fri, 15 Feb, 00:12 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Fri, 15 Feb, 00:12 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Fri, 15 Feb, 00:12 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Fri, 15 Feb, 00:12 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Fri, 15 Feb, 00:12 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Fri, 15 Feb, 00:12 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Fri, 15 Feb, 00:12 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Fri, 15 Feb, 00:12 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Fri, 15 Feb, 00:12 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Fri, 15 Feb, 00:12 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Fri, 15 Feb, 01:08 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Wed, 20 Feb, 01:03 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Wed, 20 Feb, 01:03 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Wed, 20 Feb, 01:03 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Wed, 20 Feb, 01:03 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Wed, 20 Feb, 01:03 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] cameronlee314 commented on a change in pull request #918: SAMZA-2094: Implement the StartpointVisitor for the KafkaSystemConsumer. |
Wed, 20 Feb, 01:37 |
Sanil Jain |
Samza App and Job Config Refacor |
Fri, 15 Feb, 01:00 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] Sanil15 opened a new pull request #920: SAMZA-2106: Samza app and job config refactor |
Fri, 15 Feb, 01:03 |
GitBox |
[GitHub] Sanil15 commented on issue #920: SAMZA-2106: Samza app and job config refactor |
Fri, 15 Feb, 01:03 |