spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Azuryy Yu <azury...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)
Date Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:31:24 GMT
yarn 2.2, not yarn 0.22, I am so sorry.


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Azuryy Yu <azuryyyu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Spark-0.8.1 supports yarn 0.22 right? where to find the release note?
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Yeah seems like it. He was ok with our prev release.
>> Let's wait for his reply
>>
>> On Saturday, December 14, 2013, Patrick Wendell wrote:
>>
>> > Henry - from that thread it looks like sebb's concern was something
>> > different than this.
>> >
>> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi Patrick,
>> > >
>> > > Yeap I agree, but technically ASF VOTE release on source only, there
>> > > even debate about it =), so putting it in the vote staging artifact
>> > > could confuse people because in our case we do package 3rd party
>> > > libraries in the binary jars.
>> > >
>> > > I have sent email to sebb asking clarification about his concern in
>> > > general@ list.
>> > >
>> > > - Henry
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwendell@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> > >> Hey Henry,
>> > >>
>> > >> One thing a lot of people do during the vote is test the binaries and
>> > >> make sure they work. This is really valuable. If you'd like I could
>> > >> add a caveat to the vote thread explaining that we are only voting
on
>> > >> the source.
>> > >>
>> > >> - Patrick
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> > henry.saputra@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>> Actually we should be fine putting the binaries there as long as
the
>> > >>> VOTE is for the source.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Let's verify with sebb in the general@ list about his concern.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - Henry
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> > henry.saputra@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>> Hi Patrick, as sebb has mentioned let's move the binaries from
the
>> > >>>> voting directory in your people.apache.org directory.
>> > >>>> ASF release voting is for source code and not binaries, and
>> > >>>> technically we provide binaries for convenience.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> And add link to the KEYS location in the dist[1] to let verify
>> > signatures.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Sorry for the late response to the VOTE thread, guys.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> - Henry
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> [1]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/spark/KEYS
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Patrick Wendell <
>> pwendell@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>>>> The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 5 PPMC +1's
and no 0
>> > or -1
>> > >>>>> votes.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> +1 (5 Total)
>> > >>>>> Matei Zaharia*
>> > >>>>> Nick Pentreath*
>> > >>>>> Patrick Wendell*
>> > >>>>> Prashant Sharma*
>> > >>>>> Tom Graves*
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> 0 (0 Total)
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> -1 (0 Total)
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> * = Binding Vote
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> As per the incubator release guide [1] I'll be sending
this to the
>> > >>>>> general incubator list for a final vote from IPMC members.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> [1]
>> > >>>>>
>> >
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-
>> > >>>>> vote
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Evan Chan <ev@ooyala.com>
wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> I'd be personally fine with a standard workflow of
assemble-deps
>> +
>> > >>>>>> packaging just the Spark files as separate packages,
if it
>> speeds up
>> > >>>>>> everyone's development time.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mark Hamstra <
>> > mark@clearstorydata.com
>> > >>>>>> >wrote:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> > I don't know how to make sense of the numbers,
but here's what
>> > I've got
>> > >>>>>> > from a very small sample size.
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message