spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Azuryy Yu <azury...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)
Date Mon, 16 Dec 2013 02:30:05 GMT
Hi here,
Do we have plan to upgrade protobuf from 2.4.1 to 2.5.0? PB has some
uncompatable API between these two versions.
Hadoop-2.x using protobuf-2.5.0


but if some guys want to run Spark on mesos, then mesos using
protobuf-2.4.1 currently. so we may discuss here for a better solution.



On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Azuryy Yu <azuryyyu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Patrick.
> On 16 Dec 2013 02:43, "Patrick Wendell" <pwendell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You can checkout the docs mentioned in the vote thread. There is also
>> a pre-build binary for hadoop2 that is compiled for YARN 2.2
>>
>> - Patrick
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Azuryy Yu <azuryyyu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > yarn 2.2, not yarn 0.22, I am so sorry.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Azuryy Yu <azuryyyu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >> Spark-0.8.1 supports yarn 0.22 right? where to find the release note?
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> henry.saputra@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Yeah seems like it. He was ok with our prev release.
>> >>> Let's wait for his reply
>> >>>
>> >>> On Saturday, December 14, 2013, Patrick Wendell wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Henry - from that thread it looks like sebb's concern was something
>> >>> > different than this.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> >>> henry.saputra@gmail.com>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> > > Hi Patrick,
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Yeap I agree, but technically ASF VOTE release on source only,
>> there
>> >>> > > even debate about it =), so putting it in the vote staging
>> artifact
>> >>> > > could confuse people because in our case we do package 3rd
party
>> >>> > > libraries in the binary jars.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > I have sent email to sebb asking clarification about his concern
>> in
>> >>> > > general@ list.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > - Henry
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Patrick Wendell <
>> pwendell@gmail.com
>> >>> >
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> > >> Hey Henry,
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> One thing a lot of people do during the vote is test the
>> binaries and
>> >>> > >> make sure they work. This is really valuable. If you'd
like I
>> could
>> >>> > >> add a caveat to the vote thread explaining that we are
only
>> voting on
>> >>> > >> the source.
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> - Patrick
>> >>> > >>
>> >>> > >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> >>> > henry.saputra@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > >>> Actually we should be fine putting the binaries there
as long
>> as the
>> >>> > >>> VOTE is for the source.
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>> Let's verify with sebb in the general@ list about
his concern.
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>> - Henry
>> >>> > >>>
>> >>> > >>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> >>> > henry.saputra@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > >>>> Hi Patrick, as sebb has mentioned let's move the
binaries from
>> the
>> >>> > >>>> voting directory in your people.apache.org directory.
>> >>> > >>>> ASF release voting is for source code and not
binaries, and
>> >>> > >>>> technically we provide binaries for convenience.
>> >>> > >>>>
>> >>> > >>>> And add link to the KEYS location in the dist[1]
to let verify
>> >>> > signatures.
>> >>> > >>>>
>> >>> > >>>> Sorry for the late response to the VOTE thread,
guys.
>> >>> > >>>>
>> >>> > >>>> - Henry
>> >>> > >>>>
>> >>> > >>>> [1]
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/spark/KEYS
>> >>> > >>>>
>> >>> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Patrick Wendell
<
>> >>> pwendell@gmail.com>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> > >>>>> The vote is now closed. This vote passes with
5 PPMC +1's and
>> no 0
>> >>> > or -1
>> >>> > >>>>> votes.
>> >>> > >>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>> +1 (5 Total)
>> >>> > >>>>> Matei Zaharia*
>> >>> > >>>>> Nick Pentreath*
>> >>> > >>>>> Patrick Wendell*
>> >>> > >>>>> Prashant Sharma*
>> >>> > >>>>> Tom Graves*
>> >>> > >>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>> 0 (0 Total)
>> >>> > >>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>> -1 (0 Total)
>> >>> > >>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>> * = Binding Vote
>> >>> > >>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>> As per the incubator release guide [1] I'll
be sending this
>> to the
>> >>> > >>>>> general incubator list for a final vote from
IPMC members.
>> >>> > >>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>> [1]
>> >>> > >>>>>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-
>> >>> > >>>>> vote
>> >>> > >>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Evan Chan
<ev@ooyala.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> > >>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>>> I'd be personally fine with a standard
workflow of
>> assemble-deps
>> >>> +
>> >>> > >>>>>> packaging just the Spark files as separate
packages, if it
>> >>> speeds up
>> >>> > >>>>>> everyone's development time.
>> >>> > >>>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mark
Hamstra <
>> >>> > mark@clearstorydata.com
>> >>> > >>>>>> >wrote:
>> >>> > >>>>>>
>> >>> > >>>>>> > I don't know how to make sense of
the numbers, but here's
>> what
>> >>> > I've got
>> >>> > >>>>>> > from a very small sample size.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message