spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating (rc4)
Date Sat, 14 Dec 2013 19:20:50 GMT
Yeah seems like it. He was ok with our prev release.
Let's wait for his reply

On Saturday, December 14, 2013, Patrick Wendell wrote:

> Henry - from that thread it looks like sebb's concern was something
> different than this.
>
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > Yeap I agree, but technically ASF VOTE release on source only, there
> > even debate about it =), so putting it in the vote staging artifact
> > could confuse people because in our case we do package 3rd party
> > libraries in the binary jars.
> >
> > I have sent email to sebb asking clarification about his concern in
> > general@ list.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwendell@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hey Henry,
> >>
> >> One thing a lot of people do during the vote is test the binaries and
> >> make sure they work. This is really valuable. If you'd like I could
> >> add a caveat to the vote thread explaining that we are only voting on
> >> the source.
> >>
> >> - Patrick
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Henry Saputra <
> henry.saputra@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Actually we should be fine putting the binaries there as long as the
> >>> VOTE is for the source.
> >>>
> >>> Let's verify with sebb in the general@ list about his concern.
> >>>
> >>> - Henry
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Henry Saputra <
> henry.saputra@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Patrick, as sebb has mentioned let's move the binaries from the
> >>>> voting directory in your people.apache.org directory.
> >>>> ASF release voting is for source code and not binaries, and
> >>>> technically we provide binaries for convenience.
> >>>>
> >>>> And add link to the KEYS location in the dist[1] to let verify
> signatures.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sorry for the late response to the VOTE thread, guys.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Henry
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/spark/KEYS
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwendell@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 5 PPMC +1's and no
0
> or -1
> >>>>> votes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1 (5 Total)
> >>>>> Matei Zaharia*
> >>>>> Nick Pentreath*
> >>>>> Patrick Wendell*
> >>>>> Prashant Sharma*
> >>>>> Tom Graves*
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 0 (0 Total)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -1 (0 Total)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * = Binding Vote
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As per the incubator release guide [1] I'll be sending this to the
> >>>>> general incubator list for a final vote from IPMC members.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-
> >>>>> vote
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Evan Chan <ev@ooyala.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd be personally fine with a standard workflow of assemble-deps
+
> >>>>>> packaging just the Spark files as separate packages, if it speeds
up
> >>>>>> everyone's development time.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mark Hamstra <
> mark@clearstorydata.com
> >>>>>> >wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > I don't know how to make sense of the numbers, but here's
what
> I've got
> >>>>>> > from a very small sample size.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message