spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fazlan Nazeem <fazl...@wso2.com>
Subject Re: PMML version in MLLib
Date Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:14:36 GMT
Thanks Owen. Will do it

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com> wrote:

> I'm pretty sure that attribute is required. I am not sure what PMML
> version the code has been written for but would assume 4.2.1. Feel
> free to open a PR to add this version to all the output.
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Fazlan Nazeem <fazlann@wso2.com> wrote:
> > [adding dev]
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Fazlan Nazeem <fazlann@wso2.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I just went through all specifications, and they expect the version
> >> attribute. This should be addressed very soon because if we cannot use
> the
> >> PMML model without the version attribute, there is no use of generating
> one
> >> without it.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Stefano Baghino
> >> <stefano.baghino@radicalbit.io> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I used KNIME, which internally uses the org.dmg.pmml library.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Fazlan Nazeem <fazlann@wso2.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Stefano,
> >>>>
> >>>> Although the intention for my question wasn't as you expected, what
> you
> >>>> say makes sense. The standard[1] for PMML 4.1 specifies that "For
> PMML 4.1
> >>>> the attribute version must have the value 4.1". I'm not sure whether
> that
> >>>> means that other PMML versions do not need that attribute to be set
> >>>> explicitly. I hope someone would answer this.
> >>>>
> >>>> What was the tool you used to load the PMML?
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] http://dmg.org/pmml/v4-1/GeneralStructure.html
> >>>>
>



-- 
Thanks & Regards,

Fazlan Nazeem

*Software Engineer*

*WSO2 Inc*
Mobile : +94772338839
<%2B94%20%280%29%20773%20451194>
fazlann@wso2.com

Mime
View raw message