spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Graves <tgraves...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: Spark Improvement Proposals
Date Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:50:02 GMT
I think a vote here would be good. I think most of the discussion was done by 4 or 5 people
and its a long thread.  If nothing else it summarizes everything and gets people attention
to the change.
Tom 

    On Thursday, March 9, 2017 10:55 AM, Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com> wrote:
 

 I think a VOTE is over-thinking it, and is rarely used, but, can't hurt. Nah, anyone can
call a vote. This really isn't that formal. We just want to declare and document consensus.
I think SPIP is just a remix of existing process anyway, and don't think it will actually
do much anyway, which is why I am sanguine about the whole thing.
To bring this to a conclusion, I will just put the contents of the doc in an email tomorrow
for a VOTE. Raise any objections now.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:39 PM Cody Koeninger <cody@koeninger.org> wrote:

I started this idea as a fork with a merge-able change to docs.
Reynold moved it to his google doc, and has suggested during this
email thread that a vote should occur.
If a vote needs to occur, I can't see anything on
http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html suggesting that I can call
for a vote, which is why I'm asking PMC members to do it since they're
the ones who would vote anyway.
Now Sean is saying this is a code/doc change that can just be reviewed
and merged as usual...which is what I tried to do to begin with.

The fact that you haven't agreed on a process to agree on your process
is, I think, an indication that the process really does need
improvement ;)




   
Mime
View raw message