Hi Ryan et al,The issue we’ve seen using a build of the Spark 2.2.0 branch from a downstream project is that parquet-avro uses one of the new Avro 1.8.0 methods, and you get a NoSuchMethodError since Spark puts Avro 1.7.7 as a dependency. My colleague Michael (who posted earlier on this thread) documented this in Spark-19697. I know that Spark has unit tests that check this compatibility issue, but it looks like there was a recent change that sets a test scope dependency on Avro 1.8.0, which masks this issue in the unit tests. With this error, you can’t use the ParquetAvroOutputFormat from a application running on Spark 2.2.0.Regards,On May 1, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Ryan Blue <firstname.lastname@example.org.INVALID> wrote:I agree with Sean. Spark only pulls in parquet-avro for tests. For execution, it implements the record materialization APIs in Parquet to go directly to Spark SQL rows. This doesn't actually leak an Avro 1.8 dependency into Spark as far as I can tell.rbOn Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Sean Owen <email@example.com> wrote:See discussion at https://github.com/apache/s
park/pull/17163-- I think the issue is that fixing this trades one problem for a slightly bigger one.On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 4:13 PM Michael Heuer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Version 2.2.0 bumps the dependency version for parquet to 1.8.2 but does not bump the dependency version for avro (currently at 1.7.7). Though perhaps not clear from the issue I reported , this means that Spark is internally inconsistent, in that a call through parquet (which depends on avro 1.8.0 ) may throw errors at runtime when it hits avro 1.7.7 on the classpath. Avro 1.8.0 is not binary compatible with 1.7.7.
 - https://issues.apache.org/jira
 - https://github.com/apache/parq
uet-mr/blob/apache-parquet-1. 8.2/pom.xml#L96On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Sean Owen <email@example.com> wrote:I have one more issue that, if it needs to be fixed, needs to be fixed for 2.2.0.I'm fixing build warnings for the release and noticed that checkstyle actually complains there are some Java methods named in TitleCase, like `ProcessingTimeTimeout`:Easy enough to fix and it's right, that's not conventional. However I wonder if it was done on purpose to match a class name?I think this is one for @tdasOn Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:31 PM Michael Armbrust <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 2.2.0. The vote is open until Tues, May 2nd, 2017 at 12:00 PST and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.2.0[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/The tag to be voted on is v2.2.0-rc1 (8ccb4a57c82146c 1a8f8966c7e64010cf5632cb6)List of JIRA tickets resolved can be found with this filter.The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:Release artifacts are signed with the following key:The staging repository for this release can be found at:The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:FAQHow can I help test this release?If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then reporting any regressions.What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.2.0?Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to 2.3.0 or 2.2.1.But my bug isn't fixed!??!In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the release unless the bug in question is a regression from 2.1.1.--Ryan BlueSoftware EngineerNetflix