spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Robinson <he...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Maintenance releases for SPARK-23852?
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2018 19:52:43 GMT
On 11 April 2018 at 12:47, Ryan Blue <rblue@netflix.com.invalid> wrote:

> I think a 1.8.3 Parquet release makes sense for the 2.3.x releases of
> Spark.
>
> To be clear though, this only affects Spark when reading data written by
> Impala, right? Or does Parquet CPP also produce data like this?
>

I don't know about parquet-cpp, but yeah, the only implementation I've seen
writing the half-completed stats is Impala. (as you know, that's compliant
with the spec, just an unusual choice).


>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Henry Robinson <henry@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all -
>>
>> SPARK-23852 (where a query can silently give wrong results thanks to a
>> predicate pushdown bug in Parquet) is a fairly bad bug. In other projects
>> I've been involved with, we've released maintenance releases for bugs of
>> this severity.
>>
>> Since Spark 2.4.0 is probably a while away, I wanted to see if there was
>> any consensus over whether we should consider (at least) a 2.3.1.
>>
>> The reason this particular issue is a bit tricky is that the Parquet
>> community haven't yet produced a maintenance release that fixes the
>> underlying bug, but they are in the process of releasing a new minor
>> version, 1.10, which includes a fix. Having spoken to a couple of Parquet
>> developers, they'd be willing to consider a maintenance release, but would
>> probably only bother if we (or another affected project) asked them to.
>>
>> My guess is that we wouldn't want to upgrade to a new minor version of
>> Parquet for a Spark maintenance release, so asking for a Parquet
>> maintenance release makes sense.
>>
>> What does everyone think?
>>
>> Best,
>> Henry
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ryan Blue
> Software Engineer
> Netflix
>

Mime
View raw message