spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yanbo Liang <yblia...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] [SPARK-25994] SPIP: DataFrame-based Property Graphs, Cypher Queries, and Algorithms
Date Wed, 06 Feb 2019 15:52:21 GMT
+1 for the proposal



On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:46 PM Mingjie Tang <tangrock@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1, this is a very very important feature.
>
> Mingjie
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:42 AM Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Change my vote from +1 to ++1
>>
>> Xiangrui Meng <mengxr@gmail.com> 于2019年1月30日周三 上午6:20写道:
>>
>>> Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for
>>> the offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation
>>> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions>
>>> of fraction values:
>>>
>>> The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting
>>> individual feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in
>>> which they might be intended and interpreted:
>>> +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.'
>>> -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.'
>>> -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational
>>> justification for my feelings.'
>>> ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!'
>>> -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way
>>> if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.'
>>> +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the
>>> skills necessary to help out.'
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns
>>> <martin.junghanns@neotechnology.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dongjoon,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch
>>>> docs so that anyone can comment.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>> On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Xiangrui Meng.
>>>>
>>>> +1 for the proposal.
>>>>
>>>> However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see,
>>>> it seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February).
>>>> (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.)
>>>>
>>>> Q7. How long will it take?
>>>>
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we
>>>>    predict to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA during
>>>>    April 2019, making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release (3.0,
ETA
>>>>    May, 2019).
>>>>
>>>> Bests,
>>>> Dongjoon.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Jules Damji <dmatrix@comcast.net> 于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London.
Well
>>>>>> attended & well received.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> —
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g.lee@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yay - let's do it!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng <mengxr@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994
>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25994>. It
introduces
>>>>>>> a new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property
graph
>>>>>>> construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal
>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ljqVsAh2wxTZS8XqwDQgRT6i_mania3ffYSYpEgLx9k/edit>
>>>>>>> was made available on user@
>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/269cbffb04a0fbfe2ec298c3e95f01c05b47b5a72838004d27b74169@%3Cuser.spark.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>> and dev@
>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c4c9c9d31caa4a9be3dd99444e597b43f7cd2823e456be9f108e8193@%3Cdev.spark.apache.org%3E>
to
>>>>>>> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached
to
>>>>>>> SPARK-26028 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26028>.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with
your
>>>>>>> vote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
>>>>>>> +0: Don't really care.
>>>>>>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following
>>>>>>> technical reasons.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Xiangrui
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Mime
View raw message