spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Recognizing non-code contributions
Date Tue, 06 Aug 2019 16:07:30 GMT
> I wonder which project nominees non-coding only committers but I at least
know multiple projects. They all have that serious problem then.

I mean It know multiple projects don't do that and according to what you
said, they all have that serious problem.

2019년 8월 7일 (수) 오전 1:05, Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>님이 작성:

> Well, actually I am rather less conservative on adding committers. There
> are multiple people who are active in both non-coding and coding activities.
> I as an example am one of Korean meetup admin and my main focus was to
> management JIRA. In addition, review the PRs that are not being reviewed.
> As I said earlier at the very first time, I think committers should
> ideally be used to the dev at some degrees as primary. Other contributions
> should be counted.
>
> I wonder which project nominees non-coding only committers but I at least
> know multiple projects. They all have that serious problem then.
>
> 2019년 8월 7일 (수) 오전 12:46, Myrle Krantz <myrle@apache.org>님이 작성:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:36 PM Sean Owen <srowen@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> You can tell there's a range of opinions here. I'm probably less
>>> 'conservative' about adding committers than most on the PMC, right or
>>> wrong, but more conservative than some at the ASF. I think there's
>>> room to inch towards the middle ground here and this is good
>>> discussion informing the thinking.
>>>
>>
>> That's not actually my current reading of the Spark community.  My
>> current reading based on the responses of Hyukjin, and Jungtaek, is that
>> your community wouldn't take a non-coding committer no matter how clear
>> their contributions are to the community, and that by extension such a
>> person could never become a PMC member.
>>
>> If my reading is correct (and the sample size *is* still quite small, and
>> only includes one PMC member), I see that as a serious problem.
>>
>> How do the other PMC members and community members see this?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Myrle
>>
>

Mime
View raw message