spark-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hyukjin Kwon <>
Subject Re: Resolving all JIRAs affecting EOL releases
Date Sun, 08 Sep 2019 04:54:29 GMT
Thanks for checking it.

I think it's fine by two reasons below:

1. It has another condition for such cases - one year time range.
  Basically, such PRs have not been merged for one year, which I believe
are not likely merged soon.
  The JIRA status will be updated when such PRs are merged anyway.

2. The JIRAs and PRs ideally should be updated. If the PR authors forgot to
update affected versions,
    it could be a good ping to update the affected versions in its JIRA,
which is a good practice I believe.

FWIW, currently setting 'in-Progress' doesn't properly work. It has been
few months.
I raised this issue several times at
it blocked me to search JIRAs. I had to change my JQL to check JIRAs. It's
still not being fixed. I don't know who to ask about this.

If this is not being fixed, we might not have to care about 'In-Progress'

2019년 9월 8일 (일) 오후 1:31, Takeshi Yamamuro <>님이

> Hi, Hyukjin,
> I checked entries in the list and I found that some entries have
> 'In-Progress' in their status and have oepn prs (e.g., SPARK-25211
> <>).
> We can also close these PRs according to the bulk close?
> (But, we might need to check the corresponding PRs manually?)
> Bests,
> Takeshi
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 12:15 PM Hyukjin Kwon <> wrote:
>> HI all,
>> We have resolved JIRAs that targets EOL releases (up to Spark 2.2.x) in
>> order to make it
>> the manageable size before.
>> Since Spark 2.3.4 will be EOL release, I plan to do this again roughly in
>> a week.
>> The JIRAs that has not been updated for the last year, and having affect
>> version of EOL releases will be:
>>   - Resolved as 'Incomplete' status
>>   - Has a 'bulk-closed' label.
>> I plan to use this JQL
>> project = SPARK
>>   AND status in (Open, "In Progress", Reopened)
>>   AND (
>>     affectedVersion = EMPTY OR
>>     NOT (affectedVersion in versionMatch("^3.*")
>>       OR affectedVersion in versionMatch("^2.4.*")
>>     )
>>   )
>>   AND updated <= -52w
>> You could click this link and check.
>> Please let me know if you guys have any concern or opinion on this.
>> Thanks.
> --
> ---
> Takeshi Yamamuro

View raw message