From user-return-253-apmail-spark-user-archive=spark.apache.org@spark.incubator.apache.org Thu Sep 19 17:28:35 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-spark-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-spark-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9DA61067B for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9795 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2013 17:28:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spark-user-archive@spark.apache.org Received: (qmail 9748 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2013 17:28:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@spark.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@spark.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@spark.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9740 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2013 17:28:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:28:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.54] (HELO mail-bk0-f54.google.com) (209.85.214.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:28:31 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id mz12so3558523bkb.13 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:27:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=G3cNBll0j6XryUzWDopCo+QW8UCYQzrEuCW+MsUMhEw=; b=Xp3dBXuahxjoGwUH2NRrLi2KbaAKQPg5Id2eJDenCv35E4X2lRCitp1iuL32z++GsQ heN5L5nXjajA67S5AaNySz8FFF2OtJW4GkhL4tBfl+xjOnA4e19DXW56HEnSHBsCNNWO UgW9n2o74OGvY7vCVFLEGOjVXv5FnHkw5gDb+PO1fwVb9ORVlm39oNFlXKGIioNPN7F/ rkWGFaZPsycWl1nNEB1CvmsvJQv2t3kVLkECLEglFeXux8D9wdk91FlQrsqEmuUDhL6y P93OtuNEIxCBn91/DLkdIICQDmATU1BVaK7GK+b+OEAgdu5OebZm7FF3ZSW2UyhqIzAh TpOg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl6q+YM8hnyeixi25+vlPDOo7robr+yc6KEjBzemNvn2Qz27a3WZQz6by54sbPKihgxbAEb MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.205.10.200 with SMTP id pb8mr2015551bkb.16.1379611668290; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.46.195 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:27:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6BC7BD5D-9082-44EF-AD67-EE7BAD8298D1@acm.org> References: <277FD2E8-7704-4298-8D30-02F7C8AEE4F5@icloud.com> <6BC7BD5D-9082-44EF-AD67-EE7BAD8298D1@acm.org> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:27:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Scala 2.10? From: Mark Hamstra To: user@spark.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301cc62a6aec6c04e6bfdf49 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf301cc62a6aec6c04e6bfdf49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Spark using 2.10 (or maybe 2.11) and newer Akka will come together -- but not until after 0.8.0, which is in release candidates now. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:20 AM, David Greco wrote: > Hi Spark team, > I totally agree with Paul. Spark it's an amazing tool and there are not > real competitors around. So, I definitely agree on the need to keep a bit > more up to date with the Scala world, and not only Scala 2.10 but also a > more recent version of Akka for example. > Anyway, really thanks for the great job you're doing! > > > David Greco > d.greco@icloud.com > greco@acm.org > d.greco@computer.org > https://github.com/dgreco > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davgreco > Twitter: davidgreco > > On Sep 19, 2013, at 7:14 PM, Paul Snively wrote: > > > Hi team, > > > > Please tell me the 0.8.0 release supports Scala 2.10. :-) > > > > The BDAS stack is very exciting! Unfortunately, lagging the development > of the language itself (2.11 is at Milestone 4!) is increasingly > problematic. > > > > I would also like to encourage the Spark Streaming developers to head in > the direction of making DStream conform to the Scala and Java collections > APIs. A possible model to emulate here is Kafka's KafkaStream, which > satisfies both Scala's and Java's Iterable interfaces, making their > effective use considerably more straightforward than, frankly, DStreams are > at the moment. Please also consider OOB support for Play! iteratees, which, > as of the Play! 2.2.x releases, are a nicely-separate module from the rest > of Play! > > > > Lest this sound like all complaints, I'm asking for this because I > expect to use BDAS for many years due to the lack of realistic competition > (I've already explained in-house why Summingbird isn't it) :-) and because > I'm lazy. Please keep up the excellent work, and I hope to make one of the > Meetups next time I'm in the neighborhood. > > > > Best regards, > > Paul > > --20cf301cc62a6aec6c04e6bfdf49 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Spark using 2.10 (or maybe 2.11) and newer Akka will come = together -- but not until after 0.8.0, which is in release candidates now.<= /div>


On Thu, = Sep 19, 2013 at 10:20 AM, David Greco <greco@acm.org> wrote:
Hi Spark team,
I totally agree with Paul. Spark it's an amazing tool and there are not= real competitors around. So, I definitely agree on the need to keep a bit = more up to date with the Scala world, and not only Scala 2.10 but also a mo= re recent version of Akka for example.
Anyway, really thanks for the great job you're doing!


David Greco
d.greco@icloud.com
greco@acm.org
d.greco@computer.org
https://github.com/= dgreco
http://ww= w.linkedin.com/in/davgreco
Twitter: davidgreco

On Sep 19, 2013, at 7:14 PM, Paul Snively <psnively@icloud.com> wrote:

> Hi team,
>
> Please tell me the 0.8.0 release supports Scala 2.10. :-)
>
> The BDAS stack is very exciting! Unfortunately, lagging the developmen= t of the language itself (2.11 is at Milestone 4!) is increasingly problema= tic.
>
> I would also like to encourage the Spark Streaming developers to head = in the direction of making DStream conform to the Scala and Java collection= s APIs. A possible model to emulate here is Kafka's KafkaStream, which = satisfies both Scala's and Java's Iterable interfaces, making their= effective use considerably more straightforward than, frankly, DStreams ar= e at the moment. Please also consider OOB support for Play! iteratees, whic= h, as of the Play! 2.2.x releases, are a nicely-separate module from the re= st of Play!
>
> Lest this sound like all complaints, I'm asking for this because I= expect to use BDAS for many years due to the lack of realistic competition= (I've already explained in-house why Summingbird isn't it) :-) and= because I'm lazy. Please keep up the excellent work, and I hope to mak= e one of the Meetups next time I'm in the neighborhood.
>
> Best regards,
> Paul


--20cf301cc62a6aec6c04e6bfdf49--