spark-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicholas Chammas <>
Subject Re: Regarding tooling/performance vs RedShift
Date Wed, 06 Aug 2014 20:06:52 GMT
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Daniel, Ronald (ELS-SDG)<> wrote:

> Mostly I was just objecting to " Redshift does very well, but Shark is on
> par or better than it in most of the tests " when that was not how I read
> the results, and Redshift was on HDDs.

My bad. You are correct; the only test Shark (mem) does better on is test
#1 "Scan Query".

And indeed, it would be good to see an updated benchmark with Redshift
running on SSDs.


View raw message