spot-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "solrac901@apache.org" <solrac...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Inappropriate web site
Date Fri, 28 Apr 2017 01:59:44 GMT
+1

El 27/04/2017 8:35 p. m., "Austin Leahy" <leahy@apache.org> escribió:

> Thanks Jon!
>
> I agree and think you have articulated the complexities of the problem very
> well.
> For the record here is the exact phrase:
>
> *"This installation guide assumes that a cluster with HDFS is running
> CDH."*
>
> I think that we could probably tweak this slightly and get where we need to
> be.
>
> If I can get some +1's I will make a change and submit a PR to the asf-site
> branch that modifies this to read:
>
> *"This version of the installation guide has been validated for clusters
> with HDFS running CDH."*
>
> A
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 6:05 PM Jon Zeolla <JonZeolla@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Just for clarity, because it took a minute or two of clicking around, I
> > think this <http://spot.incubator.apache.org/doc/#cdh> is what is being
> > discussed here.
> >
> > As a member of the both the Spot and Metron communities, I can say that
> > simplifying or automating deployment and configuration of either of these
> > two projects is an extremely heavy lift.  At the same time, doing so is
> > essential to reducing the barrier to entry for new users and increasing
> > adoption.
> >
> > Minimizing the variability of the platform that either of these projects
> > run on top of is critical to actually getting them off the ground, which
> is
> > why it appears they have both chosen a single platform to leverage and
> > haven't yet grown from there.  I could very easily see a point in the
> > future where either project has expanded beyond a single platform, and I
> > have in fact discussed this idea numerous times in the past.
> >
> > That said, I think the concern here is more focused on the perception of
> > commercial endorsements, not specifically using a branded but open
> > distribution of Apache software.  On that topic, I know very little about
> > the right way to approach documenting the fact that a certain platform is
> > assumed without appearing to be an endorsement.  I would be interested to
> > receive any guidance that the ASF can provide.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:20 PM Jonathan Natkins <natty@streamsets.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It might be worth noting that the Apache Metron page is somewhat guilty
> > of
> > > this, as well. In their quickstart guide, they advertise a VirtualBox
> VM
> > > loaded with HDP: http://metron.apache.org/documentation/
> > >
> > > Their installation documentation also seems to indicate that they only
> > work
> > > with HDP 2.4:
> > >
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/
> Metron+Installation+on+an+Ambari-Managed+Cluster
> > >
> > > If there's action to be taken with the Spot website, it may be
> worthwhile
> > > to point the same thing out to the Metron community.
> > >
> > > Jonathan "Natty" Natkins
> > > StreamSets | Field Engineering Director
> > > mobile: 609.577.1600 <(609)%20577-1600> <(609)%20577-1600> | linkedin
<
> > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/nattyice>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Austin Leahy <
> Austin@digitalminion.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think your point is fair.
> > > >
> > > > But I think that its also important to understand that as a community
> > > > driven project installation on CDH is currently the only install path
> > > that
> > > > has been validated.
> > > >
> > > > Until community members begin to test and install parts of the
> platform
> > > > elsewhere it is important that they understand that the docs are
> > > explained
> > > > from a particular context. As someone who has installed several
> > different
> > > > versions of hadoop including CDH I would say that there are often
> > > > surprising side effects based on who's "best practice install" you
> have
> > > > followed for your cluster.
> > > >
> > > > My meta question would be; is there a foundation requirement that
> would
> > > > lead us to prioritize basic setup and configuration specifically on
> the
> > > > apache sources? This would probably derail several of the current
> > > "install
> > > > & config" initiatives.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:47 PM Ted Dunning <tdunning@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > (To avoid confusion, please note that I am speaking as just me
> here,
> > > not
> > > > a
> > > > > director, nor as VP Incubator)
> > > > >
> > > > > On the Spot incubating web site, there is a nav element on the left
> > > > labeled
> > > > > "CDH Requirements". That doesn't seem to me to be appropriate
> because
> > > is
> > > > > looks like a commercial endorsement.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anybody have any thoughts on this?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> >
> > Jon
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message