spot-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mubashir Kazia <mka...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] New development branch for ingestion component
Date Tue, 21 Nov 2017 23:52:16 GMT
+1

On Nov 22, 2017 4:57 AM, "Nate Smith" <natedogs911@gmail.com> wrote:

+1

> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Vartika Singh <vsingh@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Cesar Berho <cesar@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, solrac901@apache.org <
>> solrac901@apache.org
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-11-21 5:12 GMT-06:00 Nate Smith <nathanael@apache.org>:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I’d like to call a vote in regards to the following:
>>>>
>>>> Creation of an Ingest redesign branch (name to be determined) and
>> linkage
>>>> of this branch to a Jira epic.
>>>>
>>>> These are the proposed requirements:
>>>>
>>>>  1. Extendible to any source.
>>>>  2. NRT latency between ingestion and output to the HDFS/persistent
>>> store.
>>>>  3. Maintain the integrity of the ODM module in order to facilitate
>>>>  seamless integration with applications.
>>>>
>>>> Please see the design spec for more details prior to voting:
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yYaD50gp2HN9RHYaUG8ASDfh3f__
>>>> GyB1Msu2LUofIU4/edit#
>>>>
>>>> I will leave the vote open for 3 days,
>>>>
>>>> - Nathanael
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 17, 2017, at 2:28 PM, Mubashir Kazia <mkazia@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 for breaking down into tasks.
>>>>
>>>> Let's resolve the comments in the doc and put it up for vote. Looks
>> good
>>> to
>>>> me otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Vartika for working on this.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Michael Ridley <mridley@cloudera.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just realized that in my re-writing and editing of the last email I
>>> took
>>>> out the part where I said that I thought it looks good.  But I do think
>>> it
>>>> looks good :-)
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Michael Ridley <mridley@cloudera.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Vartika-
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the reminder about the ingestion design document.  Suggest
>> we
>>>> open a JIRA (unless one has already been opened and I missed it) with
>> the
>>>> specific tasks broken down (create an Epic if necessary) and attach a
>> PDF
>>>> version of the architecture document.  Would also be great to get this
>>>> document into the Spot repo.
>>>>
>>>> Do we need a separate upstream branch?  I don't think there has been
>> much
>>>> development process discussion here but I would expect the work to be
>> in
>>>> the main dev branch after the patches/PRs are accepted and the JIRAs
>> are
>>>> resolved.
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Vartika Singh <vsingh@cloudera.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> The following document has been out for discussion for a while:
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yYaD50gp2HN9RHYaUG8ASDfh3f__
>>>> GyB1Msu2LUofIU4/edit#heading=h.ptz51qlqt0t
>>>>
>>>> I would like to start a new branch for ingestion component. A
>>>>
>>>> Again, the idea of ingestion component is the following:
>>>>
>>>>  1. Extendible to any source.
>>>>  2. NRT latency between ingestion and output to the HDFS/persistent
>>>> store.
>>>>  3. Maintain the integrity of the ODM module in order to facilitate
>>>>  seamless integration with applications.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Vartika Singh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Ridley <mridley@cloudera.com>
>>>> office: (650) 352-1337
>>>> mobile: (571) 438-2420
>>>> Senior Solutions Architect
>>>> Cloudera
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Ridley <mridley@cloudera.com>
>>>> office: (650) 352-1337
>>>> mobile: (571) 438-2420
>>>> Senior Solutions Architect
>>>> Cloudera
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Vartika Singh
> Cloudera

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message