sqoop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Cheolsoo Park" <cheol...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Review Request: SQOOP-635: Explaining why it's important to specify weird urandom path in Troubleshooting guide
Date Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:37:16 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7651/#review12912
-----------------------------------------------------------


I have two minor comments as below. Please let me know what you think.


src/docs/user/troubleshooting.txt
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7651/#comment27762>

    Can you change this to "as it is due to a Java bug ..."? Note that I dropped the "as"
before the "due".



src/docs/user/troubleshooting.txt
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7651/#comment27763>

    Can you change this line as follows?
    
    ", or +/dev/urandom+ will be ignored and substituted by +/dev/random+."


- Cheolsoo Park


On Oct. 30, 2012, 3:53 p.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7651/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 30, 2012, 3:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I've linked relevant Java bug and explained why it's needed.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SQOOP-635.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-635
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/docs/user/troubleshooting.txt d46a886c98be0f04303218c922f080ecab192707 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7651/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I've build docs and verified that they look ok.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jarek Cecho
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message