sqoop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Cheolsoo Park" <cheol...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Review Request: SQOOP-755 Sqoop2: Provide license file with license information for all artifacts included in binary release
Date Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:31:42 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/#review14396
-----------------------------------------------------------



LICENSE.txt
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/#comment30621>

    Typo: common -> commons


- Cheolsoo Park


On Dec. 11, 2012, 5:54 a.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 11, 2012, 5:54 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I've provided license information for all jars that are included in our binary artifact.
Everything seems fine up to jersey library that is using CDDL. Based on [1] this should be
fine as it's clearly marked and we're only depending on binary artifact.
> 
> Links:
> 1: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SQOOP-755.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-755
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   LICENSE.txt d645695673349e3947e8e5ae42332d0ac3164cd7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jarek Cecho
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message