sqoop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kathleen Ting" <kathl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request: SQOOP-1044 Sqoop2: Improve logging in metadata upgrade methods
Date Mon, 13 May 2013 04:26:04 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11074/#review20463
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Kathleen Ting


On May 12, 2013, 4:18 a.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11074/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 12, 2013, 4:18 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I've added extra logging so that we can find in log whether Sqoop server was or wasn't
performing upgrade during start.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SQOOP-1044.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1044
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/Repository.java 3e34ccb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11074/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Both unit and integration tests seems to be passing.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jarek Cecho
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message