sqoop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hari Shreedharan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SQOOP-998) Sqoop2: Upgrade: Add framework upgrader
Date Wed, 01 May 2013 19:44:16 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13646862#comment-13646862

Hari Shreedharan commented on SQOOP-998:

There is some code duplication in the MetadataUpgrader for the Framework - I don't think that
should be removed, since the metdata upgraders should be completely self sufficient and should
not depend on implementations in the base class.  

I would like to keep that as an interface, but I am leaving it as an abstract class only because
we can add methods with no-op implementations later if the need be.

(I am open to moving the doUpgrade method to a Utils class at a later stage).
> Sqoop2: Upgrade: Add framework upgrader
> ---------------------------------------
>                 Key: SQOOP-998
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-998
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 1.99.2
>            Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>            Assignee: Hari Shreedharan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>         Attachments: SQOOP-998.patch
> Framework's metadata can be also changed, so we should provide the upgrader also  for
framework itself.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message