sqoop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hari Shreedharan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SQOOP-998) Sqoop2: Upgrade: Add framework upgrader
Date Wed, 01 May 2013 19:44:16 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13646862#comment-13646862
] 

Hari Shreedharan commented on SQOOP-998:
----------------------------------------

There is some code duplication in the MetadataUpgrader for the Framework - I don't think that
should be removed, since the metdata upgraders should be completely self sufficient and should
not depend on implementations in the base class.  

I would like to keep that as an interface, but I am leaving it as an abstract class only because
we can add methods with no-op implementations later if the need be.

(I am open to moving the doUpgrade method to a Utils class at a later stage).
                
> Sqoop2: Upgrade: Add framework upgrader
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-998
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-998
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 1.99.2
>            Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>            Assignee: Hari Shreedharan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: SQOOP-998.patch
>
>
> Framework's metadata can be also changed, so we should provide the upgrader also  for
framework itself.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message