sqoop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Abraham Elmahrek <...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Sqoop 1.4.6 release lacking 0.20 artifacts
Date Fri, 08 May 2015 07:55:24 GMT
We have 3 +1s from PMC... I'm going to push the 1.4.6 release artifacts.
Thanks Gwen for finding the issue and every one for jumping in!

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <abe@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Hmm let's close this thread. Do we need an official vote thread? Or can we
> move forward without it?
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jarcec@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 on continuing with the release without 0.20 artifacts
>>
>> The Hadoop 0.20 profile is actually not Apache Hadoop 0.20, it’s specific
>> to CDH3 instead [1]. It’s there from the time when Sqoop was Cloudera
>> project running on github and we’ve just not updated it since then. Knowing
>> that those bits might not work on pure Apache Hadoop 0.20, I would even go
>> as far as dropping that profile completely if nobody objects.
>>
>> Jarcec
>>
>> Links:
>> 1: https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/trunk/build.xml#L126
>>
>> > On May 4, 2015, at 11:40 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1.  Good work identifying this Gwen.
>> >
>> > If this is an issue, we can remedy it in 1.4.7
>> >
>> > Venkat
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 5/4/15, 11:29 AM, "Abraham Elmahrek" <abe@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm +1 on this. I doubt there are many users of 0.20 these days.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Gwen Shapira <gshapira@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Sqoop Developers,
>> >>>
>> >>> There was a slight oversight on my part as a release mentor and Sqoop
>> 1.4.6
>> >>> passed a vote with 0.20 artifacts missing.
>> >>>
>> >>> I suggest that since the vote passed, we can release the artifacts we
>> voted
>> >>> on, even though 0.20 is missing. Under the assumption that if 0.20 was
>> >>> critical, the issue would be raised during the voting process (I
>> believe
>> >>> 0.20 is pretty much extinct by now).
>> >>>
>> >>> Any objections?
>> >>>
>> >>> Gwen
>> >>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message