storm-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Interesting Comparison
Date Mon, 12 May 2014 18:49:34 GMT
Anybody who has ever only paid 40K$ to IBM for anything should deserve a
prize.  That is just the entry fee.




On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Marc Vaillant <vaillant@animetrics.com>wrote:

> To play devil's advocate, if you believe the stream performance gains,
> then the 40k will likely pay for itself in needing to deploy a fraction
> of the resources for the same throughput.
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:02:53AM -0400, John Welcher wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Streams also cost 40,000 US while Storm is free.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Klausen Schaefersinho <
> > klaus.schaefers@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi,
> >
> >     I found some interesting comparison of IBM Stream and Storm:
> >
> >     https://www.ibmdw.net/streamsdev/2014/04/22/streams-apache-storm/
> >
> >     It also includes an interesting comparison between ZeroMQ and the
> Netty
> >     Performance.
> >
> >
> >     Cheers,
> >
> >     Klaus
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message