From issues-return-5551-apmail-struts-issues-archive=struts.apache.org@struts.apache.org Tue Jun 19 15:06:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-issues-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 50116 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2007 15:06:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2007 15:06:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 35243 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2007 15:06:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-issues-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 35193 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2007 15:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@struts.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 35184 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2007 15:06:50 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:06:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:06:46 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDBB7141FD for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1092873.1182265586377.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:06:26 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9_Thibodeau_=28JIRA=29?= To: issues@struts.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (WW-2002) Inconsistent client/server validation using RequiredFieldValidator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Inconsistent client/server validation using RequiredFieldValidator ------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: WW-2002 URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2002 Project: Struts 2 Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.0.8 Environment: Windows 2000, Tomcat 5.5.23, java 1.6.0_01 Reporter: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Thibodeau We noticed different behaviors between client-side and server-side validati= ons using a RequiredFieldValidator annotation. Using this annotation, an e= mpty field is considered invalid when validated on the client-side, while i= t is accepted by the server-side validation (when javascript is not support= ed). It does not downgrade gracefully. --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.