struts-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dave Newton (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (WW-2755) Problem with bad documentation version for 2.0.11.x
Date Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:52:24 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44539#action_44539
] 

Dave Newton commented on WW-2755:
---------------------------------

There's not much we can do about that; the wiki isn't versionable in a meaningful way. Each
release gets an exported version of the wiki with whatever is in it at the time of export.

The 2.0.11 documentation is almost all for 2.0; use that. We're trying to put version-specific
text on all the pages but there are a lot--feel free to help out by filing a CLA.

> Problem with bad documentation version for 2.0.11.x 
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WW-2755
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2755
>             Project: Struts 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.11, 2.0.11.1, 2.0.11.2
>            Reporter: Jérémie Quinet
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I may be wrong but it seems to me that the online documentation (and the one in the download
package) for the 2.0.11.x version is not the good one, it seems to be the one for the 2.1.x
version.
> some examples :
> * taglibs references state some attributes as being deprecated on the documentation but
it's only the case for 2.1.x version tld not the 2.0.11.x tld.
> * The interceptor pages refer to the _staticParams_ interceptor name but the correct
one in 2.0.11.x seems to be _static-params_
> * ...
> It's a problem for me as i have some projects that are going to begin the development
soon on the 2.0.11.2 version and they will need a correct documentation, at least i can point
them to the 2.0.9 one.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message