struts-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Joshua" <daniel.jos...@gridnode.com>
Subject RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
Date Mon, 02 Dec 2002 03:36:18 GMT
Yup I read it...

I also read an article on it at
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-11-2002/jw-1129-jsf.html

But, my question is, how long before it will be ready for use?

PS: It looks cool!

Regards,
Daniel


-----Original Message-----
From: edgar [mailto:edgar@blue-moose.net]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 11:22 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; andrew.david.hill@gridnode.com
Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?


The JSF Spec is a MUST READ for serious web application developers.
There is a lot of stuff going on and it will seriously effect the way
you develop and think about web applications.

http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=127

Edgar

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Hill [mailto:andrew.david.hill@gridnode.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 10:03 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?


>>"Have you got an alternative suggestion for how to build complicated
>>UIs
for a web browser *without* using client side JavaScript?"

Flash! ;-)

btw: I havent had time to look at JSF yet. Glad to hear its not just for
rendering HTML, but is it applicable to JSP based rendering approaches
only, or more generic than that?


-----Original Message-----
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 09:18
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?




On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Jonathan Holloway wrote:

> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 00:28:39 -0000
> From: Jonathan Holloway <jph8@aber.ac.uk>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <struts-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' <struts-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces?
>
> Ok in principle then it seems fine it's just I don't like the fact
> that a scripting language whether client or server side can be
> embedded in the presentation logic, it still seems like a bit of a
> workaround.

Have you got an alternative suggestion for how to build complicated UIs
for a web browser *without* using client side JavaScript?

>  I've wondered about whether the Model2X approach and the Model 2
> approach for some while now and it seems like the latter doesn't
> seperate the concerns as much as Model 2X.  The only thing that makes
> me doubt this is the fact that Sun and yourself have gone this way via

> the Model 2 approach with Java Server Faces rather than the Model 2
> approach. Is there any particular reason why this method is preferred
> over the Model 2X approach?
>

You'll have to point me at a definition of what you mean by "Model 2X"
-- I've seen the term bandied about, but don't know of any formal
description.

Regarding JavaServer Faces in particular, it is *not* a goal of JSF to
be focused purely on HTML as the markup language.  There will be a set
of common components included, but no requirement that HTML be the only
way they are rendered.  I fully expect to see JSF implementations using
all sorts of other technologies as well.

> Jon.
>

Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message