struts-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <shirishchandra.sakh...@ubs.com>
Subject RE: [OT] - Request against Session
Date Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:45:47 GMT
But what we are talking about is the concept & functionality.And what you are saying is
the implementation.
Agreed the workflow container is in session scope .But for the user(The developer), it gives
the choice of an additional scope definition.How it is implemented is not important.

Any how, when we are talking about any such implementation/Concept, we have to implement it
in the context of available APIs. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael McGrady [mailto:mike@michaelmcgrady.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:53 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] - Request against Session


At 07:50 AM 2/12/2004, you wrote:

>If user has different windows in different windows, then only the latest 
>windows workflow is honoured.SO all other window will have lost thier 
>workflow state if any...Which is desired behaviour in workflow like 
>situations...Where you dont want user to have multiple windows open and 
>accidently submit an old window with stale data thinking he was working 
>with the latest data...
>
>But you are right in the sense that all such stuff should go in framework...

This, I think, is a misunderstanding of what happens.  There STILL is a 
workflow container in session scope, and what is MORE, even where you don't 
need a workflow container, you still have one in session scope. 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message