struts-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aleksandar Matijaca <amatij...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [slightly OT] alternatives to Tiles?
Date Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:27:37 GMT
I believe that if you are using JSP includes, the included file, "looses" 
any objects that were put in using request.setAttribute(...) ? I have found
that using jsp:includes is typicaly good enough to include any group page
imports, definitions and maybe any JavaScript...

Regards, Alex.


On 6/30/05, Wendy Smoak <java@wendysmoak.com> wrote:
> 
> From: "Bill Schneider" <bschneider@vecna.com>
> > Tiles is very powerful but I've found that 99% of the time I'm only 
> using
> > it to wrap a page in a consistent layout/navigation. It seems like I'm
> > not getting enough value out of it to justify the additional layer of
> > indirection of having to touch tiles-defs.xml. I also would love to be
> > able to include header/footer pages from another webapp context.
> 
> What about plain-old jsp includes? Maybe they're "enough" for your needs.
> 
> And, tiles-defs.xml is optional-- you can use the Tiles tags directly in 
> the
> page. See if this helps:
> http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/excerpt/progjakstruts_14/index4.html
> 
> --
> Wendy Smoak
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
> 
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message