struts-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Newton <>
Subject Re: Black Box Tesing v White Box Testing
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2019 14:11:02 GMT
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 07:56 Zahid Rahman <> wrote:

> The space and defence don't share what they are doing.  So I don't think
> yours is reasonable  statement that you know what is happening  in the
> aerospace  and defence industry.

Hm. I don't think your assumption that I haven't done defense contracting
is a reasonable one, but we'll agree to disagree on that one. (If you're
wondering, encrypted radio systems, and consulting on guidance systems. And
I still know the people I worked with--and people that use the systems or
their descendents.)

FWIW: you're going to find people with a pretty wide background in this
group, many with decades of experience across a full spectrum of domains.
Speaking for myself, I come from both embedded and application development
going on 30+ years now. I know others here have similar time in the
trenches. None of us are resistant to new ideas or ways of looking at
things--but we have an appreciation for factual claims and accurate

Anyway you jumped to a conclusion of reverse engineering  when I was
> referring to the benefit of traceability when using interpretive code.

I "jumped" to reverse engineering because you specifically said an
advantage of Java was decompilation (not unique to Java), and that's a
primary component of reverse engineering almost by definition.

mo: 908-380-8699
tw: @dave_newton <>
li: dave-newton <>
gh: davelnewton <>
so: Dave Newton <>
bl[0]: Bucky Bits <>
bl[1]: Maker's End Blog <>
sk: davelnewton_skype

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message