struts-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zahid Rahman <zahidr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Black Box Tesing v White Box Testing
Date Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:32:19 GMT
Hi,

> "None of us are resistant to new ideas or ways of looking at
things"
  Happy LEARNING

  https://www.robotshop.com/uk/37-modules-sensor-kit-arduino.html
https://www.raspberrypi.org/
https://beagleboard.org/bone




On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 14:11, Dave Newton <davelnewton@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 07:56 Zahid Rahman <zahidr1000@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The space and defence don't share what they are doing.  So I don't think
> > yours is reasonable  statement that you know what is happening  in the
> > aerospace  and defence industry.
>
>
> Hm. I don't think your assumption that I haven't done defense contracting
> is a reasonable one, but we'll agree to disagree on that one. (If you're
> wondering, encrypted radio systems, and consulting on guidance systems. And
> I still know the people I worked with--and people that use the systems or
> their descendents.)
>
> FWIW: you're going to find people with a pretty wide background in this
> group, many with decades of experience across a full spectrum of domains.
> Speaking for myself, I come from both embedded and application development
> going on 30+ years now. I know others here have similar time in the
> trenches. None of us are resistant to new ideas or ways of looking at
> things--but we have an appreciation for factual claims and accurate
> representations.
>
> Anyway you jumped to a conclusion of reverse engineering  when I was
> > referring to the benefit of traceability when using interpretive code.
>
>
> I "jumped" to reverse engineering because you specifically said an
> advantage of Java was decompilation (not unique to Java), and that's a
> primary component of reverse engineering almost by definition.
>
> d.
> --
> em: davelnewton@gmail.com
> mo: 908-380-8699
> tw: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
> li: dave-newton <https://www.linkedin.com/in/dave-newton/>
> gh: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
> so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
> bl[0]: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
> bl[1]: Maker's End Blog <https://blog.makersend.com>
> sk: davelnewton_skype
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message