From users-return-19391-apmail-subversion-users-archive=subversion.apache.org@subversion.apache.org Fri Aug 23 20:55:33 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AD2E101D9 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92628 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2013 20:55:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 92607 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2013 20:55:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 92600 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2013 20:55:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:55:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brane@wandisco.com designates 209.85.215.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.181] (HELO mail-ea0-f181.google.com) (209.85.215.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:55:27 +0000 Received: by mail-ea0-f181.google.com with SMTP id d10so510053eaj.12 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:55:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3DdG8lfLSbNXbY49UjXqhwUbSqIAhNwzMiD6/8nOw4U=; b=EAz2LCQwKXShPaXpVwvjegL8tDcHNZAZuJcmHKOve9g3U7gb4sGPf9vD/mRBjTAn4w ySujCnk5B1doKkGSxpZU6p0/vCx1HvT/fsFiwaegzx/qQ7LQgcjHcYjQuoqQTuVWkoWy t4GVewJzE4ICLYkc4uAivwM5Ea0vYx66z0cR4w8Fu1Ec/oyVltNOXUX3MDvQNaG5rfv/ vOddqCOi91psBCfeMJQFLJZDBfzJVL0VV3w9YC1T+sHUY+7ZGcfQCg3O5JpZGAU+KCZp jVBTcPPGdyzGQPeA2gkxKFRXfQm5DpFrVZmK7C77YBhDU5i8v1wFAtyzD1/1zwaqDe6e huVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk4LVFX7EL1Pt6a+zZUBCc1otf9kJ9Bgos7AKuzr+0bV5SXwAFDGvZx0HTUAS5PJpmuEyGP X-Received: by 10.15.63.75 with SMTP id l51mr1970432eex.32.1377291305867; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zulu.local (cpe-62-84-226-144.dynamic.amis.net. [62.84.226.144]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm2167562eem.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zulu.local (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zulu.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35A87D88BA4 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 22:55:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5217CC27.2010502@wandisco.com> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 22:55:03 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= Organization: WANdisco User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Feature Req: sorthand urls for branches/tags in CLI References: <1B05D8F50421E24799AE93B03CC284BE01CB3C97C8@CRPMBX01.corp.cbeyond.net> <521773BB.8010401@wandisco.com> <20130823193410.GF3510@lp-shahaf.local> In-Reply-To: <20130823193410.GF3510@lp-shahaf.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 23.08.2013 21:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 16:37:47 +0200: >> * svn mkdir --branch >> Creates a new directory with the svn:branch property set, with an >> empty value >> Example: svn mkdir --branch http://host/repo/trunk > 'svn list-branches' would work how? About the same as "svn mergeinfo"? Or how about a variant on "svn status" that also looks for that prperty? Frankly, I find this problem infinitesimally small compared to the ones I mentioned in connection with the proposal given in this thread. Indexing based on the presence and/or value of a property is a somewhat orthogonal feature, IMO, but there's been a lot of interest about that as well (e.g., what did user X commit? sure, you can filter 'svn log' but that's kinda slow). If/when it appears, "svn list-branches" could use it. Until it does, we already more than one command that crawls the whole working copy or repository tree. This one is no different. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. brane@wandisco.com