Branko Čibej <brane@wandisco.com> writes:
> On 14.11.2013 19:24, Rick Varney wrote:
>> We are currently on Subversion 1.6.6.
>> What do you think? Any alternatives I have not considered? Should I
>> open a feature request for this?
>
> I disagree with the behaviour change because it makes 'svn delete' in
> the presence of svn:needs-lock behave exactly opposite to every other
> command. IMO, it's quite enough to simply fix the bug where we try to
> change the permissions on a non-existent local path.
>
> So I suggest you file a bug for that, not for the behaviour change.
We won't fix this in 1.6 and 1.8 is already fixed:
$ svn rm wc/A/f
D wc/A/f
$ svn st wc/A/f
D wc/A/f
$ svn lock wc/A/f
'f' locked by user 'pm'.
$ svn st wc/A/f
D K wc/A/f
--
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
|