From users-return-20166-apmail-subversion-users-archive=subversion.apache.org@subversion.apache.org Sat Nov 16 16:39:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15C9510AAA for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75358 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2013 16:39:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 75039 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2013 16:39:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 75032 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2013 16:39:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:39:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of blair@orcaware.com designates 108.0.197.17 as permitted sender) Received: from [108.0.197.17] (HELO orca4.orcaware.com) (108.0.197.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:38:58 +0000 Received: from orca4.orcaware.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orca4.orcaware.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id rAGGcTj7029718; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:38:29 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orcaware.com; s=default; t=1384619910; bh=MjBQv7jabXdjUG46gs4f01wDl+ZZ546Et75ucjxYo7A=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bGsnq+OeZTjHwXx+9MhAKwZGAheO9t+PRim9kVQSh9MfbwaPORwZW2Ffmo4+BeGND IcUw77ocSIBXEE8uIx1Q2kWGohxVvRDhGqvTeMPQQxfWz4QV5hTLexty4ECkn1wcmB YyHgvp3aSMMZOZQpzN816r79WcY7xbh3ogz0HNLw= Message-ID: <52879F84.8010605@orcaware.com> Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:38:28 -0800 From: Blair Zajac User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Mohr , Geoff Rowell CC: Vladislav Javadov , "users@subversion.apache.org" Subject: Re: svnmucc References: <1205807426.20131116111017@yandex.ru> <83ED6B36-D922-4B4B-816E-68803276841A@gmail.com> <20131116110642.GA17725@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> In-Reply-To: <20131116110642.GA17725@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/16/2013 03:06 AM, Andreas Mohr wrote: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 04:29:13AM -0500, Geoff Rowell wrote: >> >>> On Nov 16, 2013, at 2:10 AM, Vladislav Javadov wrote: >>> >>> rm programs/develop/fasm/tags >>> rm programs/games/mine/tags >>> rm programs/games/snake/tags >> >> Each command argument must be on a separate line: >> >> rm >> programs/develop/fasm/tags >> rm >> programs/games/mine/tags >> rm >> programs/games/snake/tags > > So, does that mean that svnmucc has single-arg support only? > Cause given this example, on the syntax side there's nothing > that would indicate that a new command is following, > rather than further options to the existing command... > (unless "rm" is one of the commands > which are specially recognized as a known-supported command) > > Sorry for my critique (and thank you for your help!) - just sayin'... Not having looked at the source code, it probably just reads from the file until it reaches the end. The reason to support this syntax with command and arg on separate lines is to support files with whitespaces in the names, which wouldn't be possible wit the syntax of command and arg on a single line. Blair