On 08/27/2014 03:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> It's not that you can't use it, just that it can't protect you from
> the things that can happen through direct file system access. Like
> accidentally deleting the whole repo or changing ownership or
> permissions.
I don't see your point. There's also a likelihood that those accidents
can happen on a remote server.
But regarding my question, if file:// is not intended to be used, as you
and Stefan Sperling argued, then what are the available options for
those who need a version control system and can't set up a server? Is
it even possible to deploy subversion in that scenario?
Zé
|