subversion-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "jleroux@apache.org" <jler...@apache.org>
Subject Re: "svn up -r" sometimes removes externals
Date Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:12:55 GMT
Thanks Andrew,

That made it.

I though hoped that by using
svn up -r1634839
It would also update the externals independently of the main repo revision

Like
svn up
alone does

Fair enough!

Jacques

Le 10/02/2015 12:44, Andrew Hemp a écrit :
> Hi Jacques,
>
> This should leave the externals properties as is:
>
> svn update -rXXX --ignore-externals
>
> cheers
>
> Andrew
>
> On 10 February 2015 at 13:36, Stefan Sperling <stsp@apache.org <mailto:stsp@apache.org>>
wrote:
>
>     On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:04:24PM +0100, jleroux@apache.org <mailto:jleroux@apache.org>
wrote:
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > Today I tried to update a custom OFBiz working copy to a specific revision and
got this
>     >
>     > C:\********>svn up -r1634839
>     > Mise à jour de '.' :
>     >  U   hot-deploy
>     > Removed external 'hot-deploy\core'
>     > Removed external 'hot-deploy\****po'
>     > Left local modifications as 'hot-deploy\***po'
>     > Removed external 'hot-deploy\********-theme'
>     > Removed external 'hot-deploy\********hh'
>     > Removed external 'hot-deploy\********comlead'
>     > Removed external 'hot-deploy\********accnt'
>     > Removed external 'hot-deploy\********common'
>     > Left local modifications as 'hot-deploy\********common'
>     > Removed external 'hot-deploy\productconfig'
>     > Left local modifications as 'hot-deploy\productconfig'
>     > Actualisé à la révision 1634839.
>     >
>     > C:\********>
>
>     > Anybody an idea (did not find anything clear in Google)?
>
>     Have the relevant svn:externals properties changed?
>     If someone removed an external definition from the property (or removed the
>     property entirely) then this behaviour would be entirely expected.
>
>     If you need more help, please clearly state which URL you checked out and
>     which revision numbers were involved so that others can reproduce your problem.
>
>


Mime
View raw message