From users-return-24331-apmail-subversion-users-archive=subversion.apache.org@subversion.apache.org Mon Feb 1 10:11:14 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CF6D188F6 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87367 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2016 10:11:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 87331 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2016 10:11:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 87321 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2016 10:11:13 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:11:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EB91A1A0044 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:11:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UEM_2O0lebC4 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 10E7420532 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:11:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Envelope-From: stsp@elego.de Received: from ted.stsp.name (ted.stsp.name [217.197.84.34]) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id u11AB8XI028145 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:11:08 +0100 Received: from localhost (ted.stsp.name [local]) by ted.stsp.name (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 24aad771; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:11:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:11:08 +0100 From: Stefan Sperling To: Philip Martin Cc: Stefan Fuhrmann , Gert Kello , "users@subversion.apache.org" Subject: Re: Svn 1.9 repository 20% bigger than svn 1.8 repository Message-ID: <20160201101108.GP8169@ted.stsp.name> Mail-Followup-To: Philip Martin , Stefan Fuhrmann , Gert Kello , "users@subversion.apache.org" References: <56AA5FF2.6040906@apache.org> <56AC8A2C.3070009@apache.org> <87lh74ago4.fsf@wandisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lh74ago4.fsf@wandisco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:06:19AM +0000, Philip Martin wrote: > Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > > > So, all user content is there and merely the deduplication failed > > (as already being investigated elsewhere in this thread). > > I suppose format 7 might allow us to implement a system that fixes > missing deduplication during packing. And perhaps get rid of sqlite in the repository while at it?