subversion-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl>
Subject RE: Weird Behaviour: Files reverted that didn't show up in a status --no-ignore
Date Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:07:51 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcorvel@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 3 maart 2016 09:30
> To: webster.brent@rogers.com
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weird Behaviour: Files reverted that didn't show up in a status --
> no-ignore
> 
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:53 PM,  <webster.brent@rogers.com> wrote:
> > We are running VisualSVN 1.9.3 server on a Windows box and a user's
> > workspace is on a Centos6.5 Linux box.
> > He had just done a "svn update" and the build failed.  No conflicts as far
> > as I can tell.  The "svn status" showed the build artifacts and his modified
> > files.  As a suggestion, he would "svn revert -R ." all his changes.  During
> > the revert, it showed numerous other SVN element(cpp & h) files being
> > reverted that he never touched and the "svn status --no-ignore" never
> > showed.  We tried reproducing it but no luck.
> >
> > I'm in the process of switching over a bunch of "old", hardened Clearcase
> > folks to SVN so this little weirdness is never good to see.
> 
> Would still be unexpected / weird, but: is it possible that those
> files were not really changed, but that 'revert' simply generated
> unnecessary notifications (showing 'reverted file X' for files that
> weren't really changed)?
> 
> You didn't mention the version of svn client. Maybe it's a
> notification bug in the client that's already fixed?

One known case of this would be if some files were not writable. svn revert will restore writability/non
writability based on whether a local lock is owned and/or svn:needs-lock is set, while status
doesn't report this as a modification.

	Bert


Mime
View raw message