subversion-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Feature request: Restoring pristines
Date Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:25:21 GMT
On 10.11.2016 17:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Hett wrote on Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:52:43 +0100:
>> On 11/10/2016 8:08 AM, Cooke, Mark wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Stefan [mailto:luke1410@posteo.de]
>>>> Sent: 09 November 2016 21:43
>>>> To: users@subversion.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Feature request: Restoring pristines
>>>>
>>>> On 11/9/2016 21:22, Branko ─îibej wrote:
>>>>> On 08.11.2016 21:51, Stefan wrote:
>>>>>> I didn't test this, but
>>>>> This is how all down-voted stackoverflow answers start. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Brane
>>>>>
>>>> OK, I see. Tested and it doesn't work. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Certainly sounds like a reasonable request for an improvement to have at
>>>> least svn co auto correct the case of missing pristine files, as far as
>>>> I'm concerned.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Stefan
>>> Would this not fit better as part of `update` rather than `checkout` over an
existing working copy?
>>>
>>> ~ mark c
>>>
>> IMO it should be part of both, since both operations (aka: svn update as
>> well as svn checkout) will error out, if a pristine would be required but
>> missing (and this is some error, the operation could easily resolve without
>> user interaction).
>>
> I thought of 'cleanup' as the appropriate place, since fixing violated
> invariants should be opt-in;

An option that makes 'svn cleanup' connect to the repository? Cleanup
has always been a local-only command.

-- Brane


Mime
View raw message