systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Date Fri, 15 Jan 2016 21:11:41 GMT
Hi Luciano,

WRT docs, it would be nice to have a snapshot of the generated
documentation site (like http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/). This
allows a historical display of documentation similar to Spark (
http://spark.apache.org/documentation.html). If that is available online,
is it necessary to package the Algorithms Reference PDF or README with the
releases? Also, the docs/README.md describes generating the documentation
site from markdown using jekyll so I'm not sure if that would help anyone
if the *.md files aren't included in the release distributions. Or is this
a different README?

Deron


On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> great - thanks Niketan. From my perspective, we're also good to go.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Niketan Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55
> AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this we]Niketan
> Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55 AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance
> experiments this week and the release
>
> From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 01/15/2016 11:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release
> SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Niketan Pansare
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar*
> <http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar>
>
> Mike Dusenberry ---01/14/2016 06:49:31 PM---The DML Language Reference
> would be great to have as well. Also, in general, I think we should only
>
> From: Mike Dusenberry <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well.
>
> Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user
> facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a user
> is not going to interact with.
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release
> distribution
> > ?
> >
> > Currently we have :
> > docs/README.txt
> > docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf
> >
> > I was planning to add the javadocs as well.
> >
> > But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could
> add...
> >
> > Suggestions are welcome...
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27*
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27>
> > >
> > > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release.
> > >
> > > Could someone please help me verify.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the
> > >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number
> > 0.9
> > >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as
> > many
> > >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think
> > about
> > >>> release branches.
> > >>>
> > >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a
> 0.9.1
> > >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming
> very
> > >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor
> > releases.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Luciano Resende
> > >> *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
> > >> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > >> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
> > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
> > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> >
> --
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message