sure - go for it; but please include into the description that a fix should try to keep operations within one dag and only separate out prints if necessary.

Regards,
Matthias

Inactive hide details for dusenberrymw---05/23/2016 02:09:32 PM---We should create a JIRA issue to track fixing this "bug" withdusenberrymw---05/23/2016 02:09:32 PM---We should create a JIRA issue to track fixing this "bug" within the engine. While the if-statement

From: dusenberrymw@gmail.com
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 05/23/2016 02:09 PM
Subject: Re: synchronized prints?





We should create a JIRA issue to track fixing this "bug" within the engine.  While the if-statement cut works as a quick hack, it would be much better to just ensure consistency natively.

--

Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry

Sent from my iPhone.


> On May 23, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> a simple workaround is to place an "if(1==1){}" cut between the prints to force their order.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> Deron Eriksson ---05/23/2016 01:55:17 PM---Hi, Is there a way to make sure that print statements are synchronized while
>
> From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 05/23/2016 01:55 PM
> Subject: synchronized prints?
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to make sure that print statements are synchronized while
> developing a DML script? By this, I mean is there currently a way to ensure
> that the order of print statements in a DML script are the order in which
> they are displayed to standard output?
>
> Deron
>
>